Your target architecture starts with real sources and responsibilities.
In a technical discussion, we review data sources, interfaces, architecture, security and the potential implementation approach.
Assess data provenance, field scope, delivery and operational responsibilities. The Architecture Center connects the four platform components with a planning example and specific questions for your architecture review.
Each building block can be assessed separately from a functional, technical and operating perspective.
TMCs, GDSs, OBTs and available enterprise data
Receive, map, check and consolidate
Shared journey records and enterprise context
TD care · travel security, TD doc · communication, TD chart · analysis, TD go · approvals
For authorised teams and travellers in each process
Prepare consolidated data for each recipient and distribute it through the available delivery method.
Connected Finance, BI, Security and other enterprise systems
TD pool brings bookings from a TMC and cost centres from an enterprise system together in the shared travel data foundation within the Travel Data Suite. TD hub provides the data view required by Finance or BI.
Planning example: field scope, updates, access and responsibilities are defined for each connection.
Which systems are sources of truth?
How are origin, freshness and conflicts made visible?
Which rules remain enterprise-owned?
How are portability and exit readiness retained?
Which personal data does each process require?
Which operating and escalation paths are defined?
Because an international travel programme often consists of several data sources, providers and enterprise systems. An independent functional layer can prevent every downstream process from having to couple directly to the technical logic of an individual travel provider.
No. NP4 connects existing systems and makes travel data usable for your business processes. Which systems can be connected depends on your landscape and technical access.
The connection method depends on the technical capabilities of the respective source and the agreed project scope. Different interface or file-based methods may be used depending on the source. Public architecture information deliberately does not disclose customer-specific technical endpoints.
Yes. Data from different sources is mapped into shared functional structures so downstream processes can work with consistent meanings. The complete internal data model is not public; the parts relevant to your implementation are discussed within the project.
Source connectivity and functional data views are separated wherever possible. This allows a new source to be integrated without automatically adapting every downstream process to the technical structure of the new provider.
Functional quality and processing rules are defined for connected sources. Which source is authoritative for a particular data point and which checks apply depends on the relevant data flow and use case.
TD hub prepares travel data for each recipient and supplies it through an agreed delivery method. The data scope, format and access rights follow the target system and intended purpose.
Public architecture information deliberately remains at an appropriate functional level. Information about privacy, information security and available due-diligence material is provided in the Trust area. Customer-specific operational details are not published publicly.
In a technical discussion, we review data sources, interfaces, architecture, security and the potential implementation approach.
Necessary cookies keep this website running. Optional analytics, marketing or social-media trackers are not currently embedded. Your choice is stored for 6 months.